The other day, I was sitting with two people I really love and respect. Two smart, thoughtful leaders I have a lot of time for. They were in the middle of a rich, honest conversation. And I wasn’t leading, facilitating, or analysing.
I didn’t have my work hat on at all.
I was just… listening
Then came the comment, sort of half joking, half not:
“Look at Susan, psychoanalysing everything we’re saying!”
I froze for a second.
Not outwardly, but inwardly, I felt it.
Because I wasn’t psychoanalysing. I wasn’t trying to “read between the lines” or find the insight behind the words.
I was genuinely enjoying listening to two brilliant humans exchange ideas.
But it got me thinking…
Why is it that deep listening, like genuine presence is sometimes read as analysis?
Why is paying attention seen as prying?
Why does curiosity get mistaken for judgement?
Maybe it’s because many people aren’t used to someone being fully present with them. Listening without distraction, agenda, or interruption. When someone listens that deeply, it can feel like a mirror is being held up... and that can be confronting to us.
Especially when you’re used to being the one in control of the narrative.
Here’s what I’ve come to realise:
And that’s okay.
Because the truth is, presence is powerful. And if it makes someone feel seen in a way they’re not quite ready for. That’s not a flaw in you, it’s a moment of growth for them.
If you’ve ever been told you’re “too intense,” “always analysing,” or “a bit much,”
Just know this:
Go on the waitlist now to be the first to know when they officially launch.
No spam. No fluff. Just EQ tools that actually work.
👉 Join the Waitlist Below
P.S. Could this kind of reaction come from analytical personalities? Absolutely.
People who lead with logic and structure often prefer clarity, certainty, and tangibility. Emotional presence, especially the kind that notices nuance, can feel unfamiliar or even confronting.
When someone’s used to processing the world through facts and frameworks, they might interpret deep listening as psychoanalysis. Not because it is, but because they don’t have the same emotional reference points.
It’s not wrong. It’s just different wiring.
Emotional intelligence means recognising that… and choosing to respond with grace, not defensiveness.